Vortex 15 8x32 Razor Hd Lh Rifle Scope Review

Review: Vortex HD LH Razor one.five-8×32 Riflescope

By Robby Denning, Rokslide Co-Owner

20 five years ago, I was all worried about maximum full light transmission through my rifle scopes. I had visions in my head of giant bucks only showing themselves at the concluding ane infinitesimal of legal shooting low-cal. I figured if my objective lens didn't resemble a pie plate, I'd never go a shot. Consequently, I lugged heavy scopes into the backcountry that looked (and weighed) more like an RPG launcher.

While information technology'due south important to exist able to see your crosshairs and quarry at first and final light, I've also learned that for any reason, I haven't shot many bucks in those few moments we all worry about so much. I've besides learned a larger objective doesn't necessarily equate to improve light transmission. A scope with optimal optical design, better glass, and better optical coatings will have much amend light transmission than a lesser scope with a giant objective lens.

For case, out of the concluding five bucks I've killed, none were taken during dawn or twilight hours; times varied from 30 minutes subsequently kickoff lite to about 30 minutes before sunset—enough of light in every case. This has pretty much been the design over my hunting career and is why I'thou not as paranoid near total light transmission in a scope if I tin can shave weight.

Now don't get me wrong on this. I'm not throwing total light transmission out the window. It's of import for sure, but for the backcountry mule deer hunter, information technology'south non the most important. I've establish that if you hunt right, yous're probably going to get a shot much closer than you think, and often at times of the mean solar day well abroad from the edge of legal shooting calorie-free. However, y'all'll probably hunt well-nigh 30 days for every opportunity at a skilful buck. That's a lot of packing between shots and is why overweight and bulky guns get the frown from my military camp.

I ran a poll amidst Rokslide members on some of the nearly pop non-long range scopes (sub 600 yards) and found that quite a few guys concord with me. Many are running scopes in the sub-40mm range with satisfactory results.

While at that place are certainly exceptions, by going with 40mm or less, you tin cull from scopes under nearly 14 ounces. Compare this to 50mm scopes that are running in the 15-20+ ounce range and besides have a higher profile requiring taller and heavier telescopic mounts. A smaller scope means you can run a lighter burglarize with a lower profile — a win-win for the backcountry hunter.

While ounce-counting in backpack hunting tin be very expensive, I've found with eyes, you tin can actually save money while cutting weight. These smaller scopes are usually less expensive than their bigger cousins in the same lines. Now we're at a win-win-win!

When I learned that Vortex was introducing their Calorie-free Hunter (LH) line, I didn't hesitate a flake to give one a try. Amongst others, I've been using Vortex optics the last 3 seasons, both riflescopes and binoculars in the Diamondback, Viper, Vulture, and Kaibab lines respectively. I've found there is plenty of value per dollar spent, offer good options for the hunter who has to keep an eye on the budget but can't settle for lackluster performance and immovability. I've not yet had to utilise Vortex'due south now famous no-questions-asked warranty, but I've only heard good things about it and their customer service.

Vortex launched the LH scopes in their Razor line. This is the superlative glass offered by Vortex and I couldn't await to have a gander through it. I was planning a muzzleloader hunt in Utah, who'd simply made scopes legal for smokepoles, so I contacted Mark Boardman, Caput of Marketing at Vortex Optics. He said in that location are three scopes in the LH line:

• The 1.5-8×32 (available with G4 BDC reticle only)
• The 3-15×42 (see Jared Bloomgren's review here),
• The 2-10×40,

The three-15x and the ii-10x are available with both HSR-4 or G4 reticles.

Nosotros decided on the 1.5-viii×32 with the G4 BDC reticle for the muzzleloader as all shots would exist under 300 yards (on a centerfire, you lot could extend this altitude to 600 yards).  Custom turrets are bachelor for all three scopes if desired.

The G4 features five hash marks (including the aim dot and superlative of bottom post) and a simple sight flick that tin save critical seconds in the field (see why I adopt hash marks over adjustable exposed turrets here). The G4 can be used for all classes of rifles from muzzleloaders to varmint, standard, and magnum calibers.

Vortex's new G4 BDC Reticle—applied, uncomplicated, splendid

I received the scope in July and promptly mounted it on my Knight 45 caliber Mountaineer. At 11 inches and 13.4 ounces, it was very compact. Setting it upward on my bench side-past-side with my Christensen Arms Carbon Summit Ti topped with the Viper 3-9×40, I could instantly tell the deviation in the image sharpness and effulgence, even though the new scope was a total 8mm smaller in objective lens. Towards night, the little Razor gave me at least a few more minutes of usable light.

I headed to the range to develop the load I'd exist using for my upcoming November mule deer hunt. The owner's guide recommended I set my hash marks using the Class D criteria (Modern Blackpowder Rifle.) At the time of the testing, the G4 reticle was not yet listed on Vortex's Long Range Ballistic Computer (LRBC,) so I used a generic reticle to estimate my hash marks' predicted POI.

Over several trips, I put around 75 rounds downrange. Muzzleloaders often kick harder than centerfires yet the piffling scope held it's nada, no problem. It likewise turned out that the LRBC got me close enough, saving considerable time and ammo when setting my hash marks. In but a few hours' time, I had an accurate MOA load deadly to 300 yards (based on at least i,000 ft-lbs of energy) in a compact scope with plenty of brightness to hunt the fringes of legal shooting calorie-free. (video here).

My actual hunt got cancelled (meet why here,) but with many hours of range utilize, and a solar day of packing information technology around the hills while scouting, I'm certain the scope will deliver on the mount.

I institute the LH Razor one.v-8×32 the best Vortex glass I've owned yet—very brilliant, very precipitous—and in a compact lightweight scope. Paired with Vortex's LRBC, the G4 reticle will work very well for the sub-600 yard hunter. If you'd like to shoot beyond that yardage, consider the HSR-iv Reticle in the 2-10x and 3-15x LHs.

I'k then impressed with the i.v-8x Razor, I'm likely going to swap out my three-9x40mm Viper on my 270 WSM for the new LH 2-10×40. While it will add three ounces, I'll be able to accept advantage of the brighter sight picture and heavier subtensions, perfect for my crumbling optics.

The only downside in the Razor line is the toll. Ameliorate glass ever costs more coin but as Dad ever said, "at that place'south no free luncheon!"

The LH 1.five-8×32 shown with Vortex's Defender Telescopic Caps available with optional Dope Disks

Specs for the LH one.5-viii×32 Riflescope
Magnification 1.5-8 x
Objective Lens Diameter 32 mm
Eye Relief iii.viii inches
Field of View 72.two-13.2 feet/100 yards
Tube Size 1″
Turret Style Capped
Adjustment Graduation 1/4 MOA
Travel per Rotation 15 MOA
Max Elevation Adjustment 110 MOA
Max Windage Adjustment 110 MOA
Parallax Setting 100 yards
Length 11 inches
Weight 13.four ounces

You can inquire questions or hash out this article hither

loosscuman.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.rokslide.com/review-vortex-razor-1-5-8x32-riflescope/

Share this post